https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295062 The court quashed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act as it failed to include a partnership firm as an accused party, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. Emphasizing the necessity of arraigning the company as an accused under Section 141, the court exercised its powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C to set aside the complaints. Consequently, the court allowed the application to quash the complaint against the applicant, solely concerning them, with direct service permitted. en-us Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 May 2021 08:29:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295062 The court quashed a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act as it failed to include a partnership firm as an accused party, following the precedent set by the Supreme Court. Emphasizing the necessity of arraigning the company as an accused under Section 141, the court exercised its powers under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C to set aside the complaints. Consequently, the court allowed the application to quash the complaint against the applicant, solely concerning them, with direct service permitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295062