<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25449</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the assessee is entitled to development rebate under section 33(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Court determined that the lease income should be considered as business income, as the leasing out of machinery was deemed a business activity by all Tribunal members. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:14:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 48 - ANDHRA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25449</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee, ruling that the assessee is entitled to development rebate under section 33(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act. The Court determined that the lease income should be considered as business income, as the leasing out of machinery was deemed a business activity by all Tribunal members. Both issues were resolved in favor of the assessee, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>