https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295051 The court quashed the second FIR against the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant and Professional Non-Executive Director, citing it as an abuse of process of law due to a prior pending case for the same offences. The petitioner's resignation prior to the alleged offenses absolved him of liability post-resignation. Emphasizing against harassment, the court highlighted the deliberate delay in filing the FIR after six years and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The petition was allowed, specifically quashing the FIR against the petitioner while preserving the right to take action against others involved. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 May 2021 15:34:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295051 The court quashed the second FIR against the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant and Professional Non-Executive Director, citing it as an abuse of process of law due to a prior pending case for the same offences. The petitioner's resignation prior to the alleged offenses absolved him of liability post-resignation. Emphasizing against harassment, the court highlighted the deliberate delay in filing the FIR after six years and referenced legal precedents to support its decision. The petition was allowed, specifically quashing the FIR against the petitioner while preserving the right to take action against others involved. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295051