<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 45 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25446</link>
    <description>Section 80J deduction calculated at a yearly rate on capital employed is not to be reduced proportionately merely because the industrial undertaking operated for only part of the previous year. The interpretation of &quot;per annum&quot; in the corresponding relief provision supports full deduction for the relevant year unless the statute expressly requires a broken-period reduction; a CBDT circular of 3 March 1984 adopted the same construction and directed that the relief should not be curtailed for non-operation during part of the year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 45 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25446</link>
      <description>Section 80J deduction calculated at a yearly rate on capital employed is not to be reduced proportionately merely because the industrial undertaking operated for only part of the previous year. The interpretation of &quot;per annum&quot; in the corresponding relief provision supports full deduction for the relevant year unless the statute expressly requires a broken-period reduction; a CBDT circular of 3 March 1984 adopted the same construction and directed that the relief should not be curtailed for non-operation during part of the year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>