https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295046 A second Section 482 CrPC application was held maintainable after withdrawal of an earlier application, because withdrawal is not the same as dismissal on merits and did not attract a bar under Section 362. The Court further held that inherent jurisdiction can be invoked on changed circumstances to prevent abuse of process. On the facts, the complaint and consequent process were quashed because the prosecution version was found intrinsically improbable, mala fide, and a counterblast intended to harass public servants. en-us Wed, 28 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 May 2021 11:40:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295046 A second Section 482 CrPC application was held maintainable after withdrawal of an earlier application, because withdrawal is not the same as dismissal on merits and did not attract a bar under Section 362. The Court further held that inherent jurisdiction can be invoked on changed circumstances to prevent abuse of process. On the facts, the complaint and consequent process were quashed because the prosecution version was found intrinsically improbable, mala fide, and a counterblast intended to harass public servants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Dec 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295046