https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295045 Availability of a revision petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not, by itself, bar invocation of the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482. That jurisdiction remains available to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and an order summoning the accused is not treated as an interlocutory order in this context. The existence of revisional or supervisory remedies therefore does not create a total prohibition on Section 482 relief. An application under Section 482 cannot be rejected solely because revision is available, and the court must consider the matter on merits. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Dec 2023 13:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295045 Availability of a revision petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure does not, by itself, bar invocation of the High Court's inherent jurisdiction under Section 482. That jurisdiction remains available to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice, and an order summoning the accused is not treated as an interlocutory order in this context. The existence of revisional or supervisory remedies therefore does not create a total prohibition on Section 482 relief. An application under Section 482 cannot be rejected solely because revision is available, and the court must consider the matter on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295045