<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25444</link>
    <description>An earlier order declining reference under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was challenged on the ground that it had relied on an inapplicable precedent. The HC held that the precedent cited by the applicant was distinguishable and that even an allegedly wrong citation, by itself, does not justify review or recall of the earlier order. On that basis, the review application was rejected and the original order remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 13 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25444</link>
      <description>An earlier order declining reference under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was challenged on the ground that it had relied on an inapplicable precedent. The HC held that the precedent cited by the applicant was distinguishable and that even an allegedly wrong citation, by itself, does not justify review or recall of the earlier order. On that basis, the review application was rejected and the original order remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>