<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 525 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407646</link>
    <description>Withdrawal of an earlier quashing petition does not prevent a subsequent petition where changed circumstances arise, including prolonged pendency of the prosecution. The right to speedy trial under Article 21 may support quashing where proceedings remain unresolved for decades, stay at the evidence stage, and delay is unexplained or attributable to non-cooperation by the complainant. Criminal liability of a professional director requires specific allegations linking that director to day-to-day management, financial dealings, or the alleged offence. Mere designation as a director, without averments establishing participation or responsibility, is insufficient to sustain prosecution and may justify quashing as an abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 08:36:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 525 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407646</link>
      <description>Withdrawal of an earlier quashing petition does not prevent a subsequent petition where changed circumstances arise, including prolonged pendency of the prosecution. The right to speedy trial under Article 21 may support quashing where proceedings remain unresolved for decades, stay at the evidence stage, and delay is unexplained or attributable to non-cooperation by the complainant. Criminal liability of a professional director requires specific allegations linking that director to day-to-day management, financial dealings, or the alleged offence. Mere designation as a director, without averments establishing participation or responsibility, is insufficient to sustain prosecution and may justify quashing as an abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>