<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25441</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the expenditure on stamp duty for the lease agreement and the payment to estate agents, allowing them as deductions. However, the expenditure on raising additional share capital was not allowed as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 44 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25441</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the expenditure on stamp duty for the lease agreement and the payment to estate agents, allowing them as deductions. However, the expenditure on raising additional share capital was not allowed as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>