https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25440 Rule 24 of the Service Rules, which authorised termination without inquiry or hearing, was treated as arbitrary and inconsistent with Article 14 because it was identical to a provision already struck down by the Supreme Court. A termination made solely under that rule was therefore unsustainable. On the consequential reliefs, the text states that reinstatement with continuity of service, full back wages and terminal benefits followed, subject to the appellant's resignation from the date of the order while preserving monetary claims up to that date. The back wages were to be treated as salary spread over the relevant period, and tax relief was to be sought under Section 89(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 21A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. en-us Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:58:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25440 Rule 24 of the Service Rules, which authorised termination without inquiry or hearing, was treated as arbitrary and inconsistent with Article 14 because it was identical to a provision already struck down by the Supreme Court. A termination made solely under that rule was therefore unsustainable. On the consequential reliefs, the text states that reinstatement with continuity of service, full back wages and terminal benefits followed, subject to the appellant's resignation from the date of the order while preserving monetary claims up to that date. The back wages were to be treated as salary spread over the relevant period, and tax relief was to be sought under Section 89(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 21A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 14 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25440