<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 597 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295017</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC is to be exercised sparingly and with caution, only to prevent abuse of process, secure the ends of justice, or give effect to orders under the Code. It is not an appellate or revisional power, so the High Court should not assess evidence, credibility, or probable defence at the investigation stage or where the matter is not fit for trial-level scrutiny. Quashing is confined to narrow categories, including cases where the allegations do not disclose any offence, a legal bar applies, or the proceeding is manifestly abusive. Mere allegations of mala fides are insufficient by themselves to justify interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 597 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295017</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC is to be exercised sparingly and with caution, only to prevent abuse of process, secure the ends of justice, or give effect to orders under the Code. It is not an appellate or revisional power, so the High Court should not assess evidence, credibility, or probable defence at the investigation stage or where the matter is not fit for trial-level scrutiny. Quashing is confined to narrow categories, including cases where the allegations do not disclose any offence, a legal bar applies, or the proceeding is manifestly abusive. Mere allegations of mala fides are insufficient by themselves to justify interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>