<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1340 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295016</link>
    <description>Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are exceptional and must be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure justice; the Court should not conduct a trial-like appraisal of evidence or assess likely conviction at that stage. Quashing is justified only where the complaint or material, taken at face value, discloses no offence, is barred by law, or is manifestly frivolous, vexatious, or malicious. Where the allegations and collected material disclose the ingredients of the offences, the prosecution should proceed. The order quashing the criminal proceedings was set aside and the trial court was directed to consider the case on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 12:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1340 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295016</link>
      <description>Inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are exceptional and must be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process or secure justice; the Court should not conduct a trial-like appraisal of evidence or assess likely conviction at that stage. Quashing is justified only where the complaint or material, taken at face value, discloses no offence, is barred by law, or is manifestly frivolous, vexatious, or malicious. Where the allegations and collected material disclose the ingredients of the offences, the prosecution should proceed. The order quashing the criminal proceedings was set aside and the trial court was directed to consider the case on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>