https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295015 A complaint arising from an agreement to sell was treated as a civil dispute because the allegations showed, at most, failure to perform the contract. The SC found no averment of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the inception, no basis to say the complainant was deceived into parting with money, and no ingredients of criminal breach of trust. On that footing, the complaint did not disclose offences under Sections 406 or 420 of the Indian Penal Code and was liable to be quashed as an abuse of process. en-us Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 May 2021 12:37:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295015 A complaint arising from an agreement to sell was treated as a civil dispute because the allegations showed, at most, failure to perform the contract. The SC found no averment of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the inception, no basis to say the complainant was deceived into parting with money, and no ingredients of criminal breach of trust. On that footing, the complaint did not disclose offences under Sections 406 or 420 of the Indian Penal Code and was liable to be quashed as an abuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295015