https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407625 The Tribunal concluded that the demand for interest from the respondent was not maintainable as the duty liability had not been determined. The duty was paid by the importer in 2013 and enjoyed by the department. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order, which set aside the adjudication order demanding interest from the respondent. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objections were disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407625 The Tribunal concluded that the demand for interest from the respondent was not maintainable as the duty liability had not been determined. The duty was paid by the importer in 2013 and enjoyed by the department. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the Commissioner (Appeals) order, which set aside the adjudication order demanding interest from the respondent. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the cross-objections were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 13 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407625