https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407616 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, once the complainant proves the loan transaction, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, and service of statutory notice, the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act operates unless the accused rebuts it with a probable defence. A bare plea of repayment, unsupported by evidence, is insufficient to displace that presumption. In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings are not interfered with absent glaring illegality or miscarriage of justice. The conviction was maintained, while the sentence was modified by reducing the fine and adjusting the default consequence. en-us Wed, 12 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 May 2021 08:27:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407616 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, once the complainant proves the loan transaction, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, and service of statutory notice, the statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act operates unless the accused rebuts it with a probable defence. A bare plea of repayment, unsupported by evidence, is insufficient to displace that presumption. In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings are not interfered with absent glaring illegality or miscarriage of justice. The conviction was maintained, while the sentence was modified by reducing the fine and adjusting the default consequence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407616