https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407608 The Court found in favor of the petitioner, an exporter, in their challenge against the consolidation of refund claims under SGST alone, which led to the denial of refunds under CGST and IGST. The Court determined that the petitioner's eligibility for refunds under CGST and IGST was supported by verified documents and export proofs, despite the software error that auto-populated the refund under SGST. The Court set aside the rejection of CGST and IGST refund claims, directing the second respondent to verify eligibility and process the refunds within eight weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407608 The Court found in favor of the petitioner, an exporter, in their challenge against the consolidation of refund claims under SGST alone, which led to the denial of refunds under CGST and IGST. The Court determined that the petitioner's eligibility for refunds under CGST and IGST was supported by verified documents and export proofs, despite the software error that auto-populated the refund under SGST. The Court set aside the rejection of CGST and IGST refund claims, directing the second respondent to verify eligibility and process the refunds within eight weeks. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws GST Thu, 18 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407608