<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 482 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407603</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, which upheld the AO&#039;s classification of the declared amount as undisclosed income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the AO to treat the amount as business income, citing inadequate justification for the initial classification and aligning with precedent from a coordinate Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2024 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 482 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407603</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, overturning the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, which upheld the AO&#039;s classification of the declared amount as undisclosed income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal directed the AO to treat the amount as business income, citing inadequate justification for the initial classification and aligning with precedent from a coordinate Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>