<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1883 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D by considering only investments earning exempt income. The disallowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) was deleted due to the availability of sufficient own funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 08:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644293" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1883 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D by considering only investments earning exempt income. The disallowance of interest expenses under Section 36(1)(iii) was deleted due to the availability of sufficient own funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>