<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the assessee qualifies as a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, due to its proximity to NMMC. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s calculation of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) at Rs. 2.57 crores. The AO&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced on 3rd July 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 08:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1372 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the land sold by the assessee qualifies as a capital asset under section 2(14) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, due to its proximity to NMMC. The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and upheld the AO&#039;s calculation of Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) at Rs. 2.57 crores. The AO&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced on 3rd July 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>