https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295007 The Tribunal found that the Appellant was not required to reverse the credit under Rule 6 of the Credit Rules for the disputed period, ruling in favor of the Appellant. The Tribunal determined that the goods in question did not fall under the category of excisable or exempted goods, thereby dismissing the duty demand. The decision was based on a marketability test and the interpretation of relevant provisions, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal filed by the Appellant. en-us Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 May 2021 08:25:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295007 The Tribunal found that the Appellant was not required to reverse the credit under Rule 6 of the Credit Rules for the disputed period, ruling in favor of the Appellant. The Tribunal determined that the goods in question did not fall under the category of excisable or exempted goods, thereby dismissing the duty demand. The decision was based on a marketability test and the interpretation of relevant provisions, ultimately setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal filed by the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295007