<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1446 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295011</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned orders and dismissing the respondent&#039;s writ petition. The court found the termination order to be legal, with no right to reinstatement due to lack of similarity between the cases cited and inordinate delay in filing the writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and denied relief based on delay and laches. The High Court&#039;s interim order was quashed, and the contempt petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2021 08:25:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1446 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295011</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned orders and dismissing the respondent&#039;s writ petition. The court found the termination order to be legal, with no right to reinstatement due to lack of similarity between the cases cited and inordinate delay in filing the writ petition. The court emphasized the importance of timely legal action and denied relief based on delay and laches. The High Court&#039;s interim order was quashed, and the contempt petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>