https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295012 Enforcement of a foreign award under Sections 47 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as a substantive enforcement petition, not an execution application under Order XXI CPC. Limitation is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and Section 5 can apply to condone delay. Refusal on public policy grounds under Section 48 is narrowly confined and does not permit reappreciation of evidence or merits review; the tribunal's contractual interpretation was a plausible view. The seat court's challenge is governed by the curial law of the juridical seat, while Indian enforcement is separately assessed under Section 48. The award remained enforceable in India. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 May 2021 08:25:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295012 Enforcement of a foreign award under Sections 47 and 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is treated as a substantive enforcement petition, not an execution application under Order XXI CPC. Limitation is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, and Section 5 can apply to condone delay. Refusal on public policy grounds under Section 48 is narrowly confined and does not permit reappreciation of evidence or merits review; the tribunal's contractual interpretation was a plausible view. The seat court's challenge is governed by the curial law of the juridical seat, while Indian enforcement is separately assessed under Section 48. The award remained enforceable in India. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=295012