<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407587</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessee&#039;s activities constituted &#039;manufacture&#039; under the IT Act, directed the AO to determine market value of iron ore based on purchase price, and deleted the disallowance under section 14A. All substantial questions of law were decided in favor of the Assessee, leading to the dismissal of certain appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 466 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407587</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s findings that the Assessee&#039;s activities constituted &#039;manufacture&#039; under the IT Act, directed the AO to determine market value of iron ore based on purchase price, and deleted the disallowance under section 14A. All substantial questions of law were decided in favor of the Assessee, leading to the dismissal of certain appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>