<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 459 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407580</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s refusal to admit the appeal, emphasizing that the initial rejection was solely due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and not on the merits. The Court reinstated the appeal for consideration on its merits, stressing the importance of a fair hearing and rejecting the argument for an alternative remedy. The decision highlighted the need to adhere to legal procedures and provide opportunities for a fair hearing before passing any orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 08:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 459 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407580</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s refusal to admit the appeal, emphasizing that the initial rejection was solely due to non-compliance with pre-deposit requirements and not on the merits. The Court reinstated the appeal for consideration on its merits, stressing the importance of a fair hearing and rejecting the argument for an alternative remedy. The decision highlighted the need to adhere to legal procedures and provide opportunities for a fair hearing before passing any orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>