https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407579 The appellant wrongly availed Cenvat credit on outward transportation of final goods beyond the factory gate. The order confirmed the demand, stating that such transportation did not qualify as an input service. The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Tribunal to review the Circular on the determination of the place of removal and provide a new decision after hearing the appellant. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407579 The appellant wrongly availed Cenvat credit on outward transportation of final goods beyond the factory gate. The order confirmed the demand, stating that such transportation did not qualify as an input service. The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Tribunal to review the Circular on the determination of the place of removal and provide a new decision after hearing the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407579