<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 457 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407578</link>
    <description>A witness may be recalled and evidence reopened under Section 311 CrPC only when necessary for a just decision, not to cure omissions or fill lacunae caused by lack of diligence. The complainant sought to reopen evidence, recall PW.2, and file additional documents after repeated opportunities had already been granted and the same purpose had earlier been allowed once. As the authorization and partnership deed were known to be relevant but had not been produced earlier, the court treated the renewed attempt as belated and negligent. Refusal to reopen the evidence, recall PW.2, and receive the documents was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 08:34:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 457 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407578</link>
      <description>A witness may be recalled and evidence reopened under Section 311 CrPC only when necessary for a just decision, not to cure omissions or fill lacunae caused by lack of diligence. The complainant sought to reopen evidence, recall PW.2, and file additional documents after repeated opportunities had already been granted and the same purpose had earlier been allowed once. As the authorization and partnership deed were known to be relevant but had not been produced earlier, the court treated the renewed attempt as belated and negligent. Refusal to reopen the evidence, recall PW.2, and receive the documents was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>