<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 451 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407572</link>
    <description>A cheque dishonour complaint under Section 200 CrPC may be maintained through a duly authorised power of attorney holder where the attorney is competent to act for the complainant and the complaint is properly verified. A disputed date or validity of the power of attorney raises a factual issue that is ordinarily not suitable for quashing at the threshold and should be tested at trial. The objection that no supporting affidavit accompanied the complaints was rejected because the record showed a sworn affidavit. On this reasoning, no ground existed to invoke inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings, and the complaints were allowed to proceed to trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 May 2021 08:34:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 451 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407572</link>
      <description>A cheque dishonour complaint under Section 200 CrPC may be maintained through a duly authorised power of attorney holder where the attorney is competent to act for the complainant and the complaint is properly verified. A disputed date or validity of the power of attorney raises a factual issue that is ordinarily not suitable for quashing at the threshold and should be tested at trial. The objection that no supporting affidavit accompanied the complaints was rejected because the record showed a sworn affidavit. On this reasoning, no ground existed to invoke inherent jurisdiction to quash the proceedings, and the complaints were allowed to proceed to trial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>