<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1545 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294983</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on a net income of Rs. 1,36,41,639. It was determined that there was no direct nexus between interest/dividend income and interest expenditure, and interest income from co-operative banks was deemed eligible for deduction. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The decision was rendered on 18-04-2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1545 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294983</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee a deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) on a net income of Rs. 1,36,41,639. It was determined that there was no direct nexus between interest/dividend income and interest expenditure, and interest income from co-operative banks was deemed eligible for deduction. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order. The decision was rendered on 18-04-2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>