<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 417 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407538</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of because the reassessment initiated under the impugned notice had already been completed, making the challenge to the notice no longer the effective forum for relief. The petitioner was left at liberty to pursue the separate writ petition filed against the assessment order, preserving the challenge at the assessment stage rather than on the completed reassessment notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 11:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 417 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407538</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of because the reassessment initiated under the impugned notice had already been completed, making the challenge to the notice no longer the effective forum for relief. The petitioner was left at liberty to pursue the separate writ petition filed against the assessment order, preserving the challenge at the assessment stage rather than on the completed reassessment notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>