<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 16 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25417</link>
    <description>Following earlier Division Bench rulings involving the same assessee, the contingency reserve was held not to constitute commercial profit or real income and was therefore not includible in total assessable income. The HC affirmed that the Tribunal was correct in excluding the reserve from taxation, and the issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 16 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25417</link>
      <description>Following earlier Division Bench rulings involving the same assessee, the contingency reserve was held not to constitute commercial profit or real income and was therefore not includible in total assessable income. The HC affirmed that the Tribunal was correct in excluding the reserve from taxation, and the issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>