<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 413 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions on account of interest received from banks, advances to contractors, and miscellaneous income from the sale of scrap. The Tribunal determined that these receipts were capital in nature and should be set off against preoperative expenses, following established judicial precedents. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 413 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions on account of interest received from banks, advances to contractors, and miscellaneous income from the sale of scrap. The Tribunal determined that these receipts were capital in nature and should be set off against preoperative expenses, following established judicial precedents. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>