<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 401 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407522</link>
    <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, a revision that enhances tax dues is not a mere clerical or arithmetical correction and requires prior notice and hearing; the revised quantification was therefore procedurally vulnerable. However, the petitioner&#039;s month-wise basis of computation was rejected because service tax returns were filed half-yearly and the Scheme&#039;s statutory formula, linked to the return filed under the relevant indirect tax enactment, governed the calculation. The writ petitions were treated as maintainable in light of the timely declarations and COVID-19 related extensions, but the substantive challenge failed except on the notice point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 401 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407522</link>
      <description>Under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, a revision that enhances tax dues is not a mere clerical or arithmetical correction and requires prior notice and hearing; the revised quantification was therefore procedurally vulnerable. However, the petitioner&#039;s month-wise basis of computation was rejected because service tax returns were filed half-yearly and the Scheme&#039;s statutory formula, linked to the return filed under the relevant indirect tax enactment, governed the calculation. The writ petitions were treated as maintainable in light of the timely declarations and COVID-19 related extensions, but the substantive challenge failed except on the notice point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>