<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407518</link>
    <description>The Petitioner failed to prove the existence of any outstanding operational debt as required under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The invoices presented were fully paid, additional charges were unsupported, confirmatory letters were potentially forged, and cheques were deemed security deposits. As a result, the petition was dismissed in Case CP (IB)424/MB/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 397 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407518</link>
      <description>The Petitioner failed to prove the existence of any outstanding operational debt as required under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The invoices presented were fully paid, additional charges were unsupported, confirmatory letters were potentially forged, and cheques were deemed security deposits. As a result, the petition was dismissed in Case CP (IB)424/MB/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>