<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 394 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407515</link>
    <description>Cash deposits explained through an Agreement to Sell and supporting affidavit could not be rejected without examining the underlying facts, including ownership, actual sale, transferee identity, and the consideration realised. A signed document could not be discarded casually, and any dispute about authenticity or signatures required proper enquiry, including forensic verification where necessary. The affidavit also could not be ignored without dealing with its contents and recording reasons. As the lower authorities had not made findings on the assessee&#039;s business or the surrounding circumstances, the addition was not sustained and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after proper enquiry and a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:28:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 394 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407515</link>
      <description>Cash deposits explained through an Agreement to Sell and supporting affidavit could not be rejected without examining the underlying facts, including ownership, actual sale, transferee identity, and the consideration realised. A signed document could not be discarded casually, and any dispute about authenticity or signatures required proper enquiry, including forensic verification where necessary. The affidavit also could not be ignored without dealing with its contents and recording reasons. As the lower authorities had not made findings on the assessee&#039;s business or the surrounding circumstances, the addition was not sustained and the matter was remanded to the first appellate authority for fresh adjudication after proper enquiry and a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>