<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 388 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407509</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 to substitute his view with that of the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner and restored the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3). The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the impugned order under section 263 was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 388 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407509</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in assuming jurisdiction under section 263 to substitute his view with that of the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Principal Commissioner and restored the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3). The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the impugned order under section 263 was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>