<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 376 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407497</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and vacating the penalty imposed under Sec. 271(1)(c) due to the allowance of deduction under Sec. 80P. The judgment emphasized the genuine belief of the assessee and the procedural aspects involved in electronically filing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 376 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407497</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, condoning the delay in filing the appeal and vacating the penalty imposed under Sec. 271(1)(c) due to the allowance of deduction under Sec. 80P. The judgment emphasized the genuine belief of the assessee and the procedural aspects involved in electronically filing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>