<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407496</link>
    <description>The appeals by the assessee, involving non genuine purchases for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, were partly allowed by the Tribunal. The assessing officer&#039;s 12.5% profit estimation on alleged non genuine purchases was reduced to 5% due to the failure to verify authenticity and considering normal profit margins in the business. The importance of verifying purchase authenticity and maintaining fairness to the assessee was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407496</link>
      <description>The appeals by the assessee, involving non genuine purchases for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, were partly allowed by the Tribunal. The assessing officer&#039;s 12.5% profit estimation on alleged non genuine purchases was reduced to 5% due to the failure to verify authenticity and considering normal profit margins in the business. The importance of verifying purchase authenticity and maintaining fairness to the assessee was emphasized in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>