<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 374 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim under section 54, holding that &quot;a residential house&quot; can include multiple residential units. The Tribunal determined that the amendment in section 54 was not applicable retrospectively, thus allowing the deduction for investing in two residential flats. The appeal was allowed, and the disallowance of the claim under section 54/54F was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 374 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim under section 54, holding that &quot;a residential house&quot; can include multiple residential units. The Tribunal determined that the amendment in section 54 was not applicable retrospectively, thus allowing the deduction for investing in two residential flats. The appeal was allowed, and the disallowance of the claim under section 54/54F was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>