<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294965</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to classify interest income as capital receipts rather than income from other sources. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming that the interest earned during construction was linked to the project setup and should be treated as capital receipts. Precedents from the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court supported this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1930 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294965</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to classify interest income as capital receipts rather than income from other sources. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming that the interest earned during construction was linked to the project setup and should be treated as capital receipts. Precedents from the Supreme Court and Delhi High Court supported this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>