<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1544 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294964</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction under section 80-IB(10), finding that the assessee breached both the area restriction and allotment conditions. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of complying with tax provisions to qualify for deductions and highlighting the intent of section 80-IB(10) to promote housing for low and middle-income groups.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1544 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294964</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the AO&#039;s decision to disallow the deduction under section 80-IB(10), finding that the assessee breached both the area restriction and allotment conditions. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the necessity of complying with tax provisions to qualify for deductions and highlighting the intent of section 80-IB(10) to promote housing for low and middle-income groups.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>