https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294961 A plaint must be read as a whole on its own averments to determine whether a surviving cause of action exists under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC. Where the original co-plaintiff's name had been deleted and possession of the rooms had already been surrendered in compliance with an earlier order, the factual foundation of the suit was treated as having ceased to subsist. As no independent cause of action remained for the continuing plaintiff, rejection of the plaint was upheld. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 May 2021 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294961 A plaint must be read as a whole on its own averments to determine whether a surviving cause of action exists under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC. Where the original co-plaintiff's name had been deleted and possession of the rooms had already been surrendered in compliance with an earlier order, the factual foundation of the suit was treated as having ceased to subsist. As no independent cause of action remained for the continuing plaintiff, rejection of the plaint was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294961