<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1534 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294970</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to jurisdictional issues. The AO who initiated the reassessment lacked jurisdiction, and the subsequent transfer to another AO did not cure this defect. Therefore, the reassessment was deemed illegal and set aside, leading to the deletion of the additional tax assessment and a favorable outcome for the assessee. The judgment underscored the importance of the AO having valid jurisdiction to conduct reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 May 2021 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1534 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294970</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to jurisdictional issues. The AO who initiated the reassessment lacked jurisdiction, and the subsequent transfer to another AO did not cure this defect. Therefore, the reassessment was deemed illegal and set aside, leading to the deletion of the additional tax assessment and a favorable outcome for the assessee. The judgment underscored the importance of the AO having valid jurisdiction to conduct reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>