<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of ITC in respect of Export of Service</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117214</link>
    <description>The dispute concerns whether values of exported services with payments pending at the end of the refund period must be treated as &quot;non-zero-rated supply of services&quot; within the Adjusted Total Turnover denominator of the Rule 89(4) refund formula. The department treats such pending export proceeds as non-zero-rated, reducing the refundable ITC, while the taxpayer contends that bona fide zero-rated exports, with proceeds received within the statutory time and no breach of conditions, should not be recharacterized as non-zero-rated for refund computation; appeal of adverse orders is the suggested remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 20:09:40 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of ITC in respect of Export of Service</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117214</link>
      <description>The dispute concerns whether values of exported services with payments pending at the end of the refund period must be treated as &quot;non-zero-rated supply of services&quot; within the Adjusted Total Turnover denominator of the Rule 89(4) refund formula. The department treats such pending export proceeds as non-zero-rated, reducing the refundable ITC, while the taxpayer contends that bona fide zero-rated exports, with proceeds received within the statutory time and no breach of conditions, should not be recharacterized as non-zero-rated for refund computation; appeal of adverse orders is the suggested remedy.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 20:09:40 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=117214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>