<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Claim on Car Parking Sale 99% Approved; Only 1% Under Review for AY 2012-13 Consistency.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57932</link>
    <description>Unaccounted sales of car parking area - Nothing came into the notice that there is any change or variation in the order passed by the Ld.CIT(A) for the AY 2012-13. in which the claim of the assessee regarding sale of parking was allowed to the extent of 99%. Needless to say that in the present assessment year, the claim of 1% is only in question. The facts are not distinguishable at this stage. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 18:11:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 18:11:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644075" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Claim on Car Parking Sale 99% Approved; Only 1% Under Review for AY 2012-13 Consistency.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57932</link>
      <description>Unaccounted sales of car parking area - Nothing came into the notice that there is any change or variation in the order passed by the Ld.CIT(A) for the AY 2012-13. in which the claim of the assessee regarding sale of parking was allowed to the extent of 99%. Needless to say that in the present assessment year, the claim of 1% is only in question. The facts are not distinguishable at this stage. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 18:11:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57932</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>