<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407493</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the refund of the surplus amount to the petitioner and lifting the property attachment. The judgment emphasized the importance of valid assessment orders for enforcing revenue demands and upheld the petitioner&#039;s compliance with the Settlement Act&#039;s remittance requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:30:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 372 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407493</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the refund of the surplus amount to the petitioner and lifting the property attachment. The judgment emphasized the importance of valid assessment orders for enforcing revenue demands and upheld the petitioner&#039;s compliance with the Settlement Act&#039;s remittance requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>