<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407490</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court allowed the petitioner to furnish a personal bond instead of a bank guarantee for the remaining tax and penalty amount, with a stay on the balance until the appeal was decided by the first appellate authority. The court modified the earlier order to this extent, emphasizing the limited scope of the change and not awarding any costs in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 369 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407490</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court allowed the petitioner to furnish a personal bond instead of a bank guarantee for the remaining tax and penalty amount, with a stay on the balance until the appeal was decided by the first appellate authority. The court modified the earlier order to this extent, emphasizing the limited scope of the change and not awarding any costs in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>