<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 359 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407480</link>
    <description>Directions issued by RBI under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 for banking policy and capital adequacy were treated as a valid basis for the Basel III Master Circular, not as an impermissible implementation of international standards under Article 253. AT 1 bonds were described as regulatory capital with perpetual tenor, subordination and loss-absorbency, and were held not to be share capital or debentures under the Companies Act, 2013. The write-down structure was upheld as rationally connected to financial stability and capital adequacy, with no violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 or 300-A. The Master Circular and AT 1 framework were therefore sustained as intra vires and lawful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:29:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 359 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407480</link>
      <description>Directions issued by RBI under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 for banking policy and capital adequacy were treated as a valid basis for the Basel III Master Circular, not as an impermissible implementation of international standards under Article 253. AT 1 bonds were described as regulatory capital with perpetual tenor, subordination and loss-absorbency, and were held not to be share capital or debentures under the Companies Act, 2013. The write-down structure was upheld as rationally connected to financial stability and capital adequacy, with no violation of Articles 14, 19, 21 or 300-A. The Master Circular and AT 1 framework were therefore sustained as intra vires and lawful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>