<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 342 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407463</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147 due to the invalid initiation based on borrowed satisfaction. The Tribunal did not adjudicate on the legitimacy of the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 under Section 68 as the issue became academic following the quashing of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:28:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 342 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407463</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147 due to the invalid initiation based on borrowed satisfaction. The Tribunal did not adjudicate on the legitimacy of the addition of Rs. 20,00,000 under Section 68 as the issue became academic following the quashing of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407463</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>