<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 335 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, finding that the customs officers did not follow proper procedures and used undue influence on the importer. The importer is entitled to consequential benefits. The decision emphasized adherence to procedural requirements under the Customs Act, 1962, including the necessity of a speaking order when reassessing declared values of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 335 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, finding that the customs officers did not follow proper procedures and used undue influence on the importer. The importer is entitled to consequential benefits. The decision emphasized adherence to procedural requirements under the Customs Act, 1962, including the necessity of a speaking order when reassessing declared values of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>