<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1618 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294951</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming Cenvat Credit on legal services and consultancy charges but disallowing credit for club membership expenses. The appellant was not required to reverse credits compliantly reversed under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR, 2004. The penalty imposed was set aside due to no evidence of suppression of facts. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 08:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=644004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1618 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294951</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming Cenvat Credit on legal services and consultancy charges but disallowing credit for club membership expenses. The appellant was not required to reverse credits compliantly reversed under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CCR, 2004. The penalty imposed was set aside due to no evidence of suppression of facts. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits as per the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>